Thoughts on ITS ...

A few years ago I wrote a contribution to a book on ITS and I looked at security aspects. I've revisited what I wrote then and offer a very slightly updated summary of my introduction to the chapter.

Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) are a specialised subset of machine-to-machine communications in a software driven and all-connected world. There are a number of dimensions of ITS and different authors may present different lists of them but for the purposes of examining the security issues this list will suffice:

  • Advanced Traveller Information Systems (ATIS),
  • Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS),
  • ITS-Enabled Transportation Pricing Systems,
  • Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS),
  • Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Integration (VII), and,
  • Vehicle-to-Vehicle Integration (V2V)


Co-operative ITS (C-ITS) sits in this list as a special case of both VII and V2V, with the functionality of C-ITS centred on the exchange of data between co-operating ITS stations. My view is that this leads to a "root concept" that underpins C-ITS, and that is the process of giving machines some degree of spatial awareness. In moving along this concept we use that spatial awareness to protect both an ITS-Station's own space and the space of all other transport users. If we consider the thing that seems to concern most motorists more than anything else, it is fear of having a collision. This ranges from a little bump in a car park all the way to the catastrophic collision on a motorway. The basic idea of spatial awareness as a defence comes from martial arts -- if you know where your opponent is aiming then make sure you're not there when his blow lands. Same in a car -- if something is on a path to hit you make sure you're not there when the blow lands or be in a position where the damage is negligible. Is the martial arts analogy still valid? I think so but it also raises a concern that our roads are battle-zones and if we treat vehicles as fighters we could end up in a very bad space. So let's not think about fighting but about sharing.

Spatial awareness for a driver means being aware of where you and your vehicle are with respect to all other vehicles and the infrastructure in order to ensure that you are not encroaching on the safe zone around any other road user. In a conventional vehicle this means using your senses of sight and hearing to continuously build up a mental 3-dimensional map of the other road-users around you and working to ensure you are "safe" with respect to them. This is done through constantly using mirrors, moving around to eliminate blind spots (not moving the vehicle but your body), listening for other vehicles and so forth. However in many ways the design of road vehicles has increasingly limited the ability of a driver to build up this 3-D mental map by being quieter, having more restricted visibility and having a number of distraction technologies to hand (e.g. phones, music, navigation tools). The excuse of "I didn't see you" is the first thing to be reported from far too many accidents and one of the roles of C-ITS is to eliminate the blind spot and allow vehicles to see each other in all environments.

One of the other concerns raised when C-ITS was first conceived is that by transmitting information that allows receivers to build up a spatial model of how your vehicle is interacting with it, the same data could be used to track you. C-ITS has been designed to operate in areas of the world where expectations of privacy are high and therefore the protection of users from being tracked, or of their transmissions being used against them, has been very high on the agenda and C-ITS has been built to maximise privacy protection.

The bulk of ITS types (ATIS, ATMS, APTS, etc.) are data centric, in that they gather and distribute data. What differentiates them is where the data comes from and who its intended recipients are. For VII and V2V, and more specifically C-ITS, data comes from the co-operating vehicles and is intended for those vehicles. In the native environment in which vehicles find themselves the safety of any individual vehicle is determined by a set of factors that include:

  • Driver awareness,
  • Vehicle road-worthiness,
  • Road conditions,
  • Weather conditions,
  • Traffic signalling,
  • Relative velocity,
  • Other vehicles


What C-ITS will achieve, at least in intent, is greater driver awareness by giving authoritative information to the driver on their relative velocity and the presence of other vehicles and their vectors. The key term is "authoritative information". The purpose in C-ITS security is to assure the receivers of C-ITS data that it genuinely comes from a vehicle and is an accurate representation of the location and nature of the vehicle. 

So what's new? I guess the biggest challenge to C-ITS is a threat to the radio band in use. If C-ITS was to be on a single dedicated frequency band, with one and only one transmission option, for example the G5 radio defined mostly in the IEEE as 802.11p (now just one mode in 802.11) is ideal - it is range limited, it is power limited (the combination of the frequency and transmission power serve as a physical limit to the range). Expanding C-ITS to a cellular infrastructure could change the whole interpretation of spatial awareness and I'm going to dedicate a blog-post to that fairly soon.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts

Balancing functionality, usability and security in design

Image
Introduction When designing new devices or applications there is a requirement nowadays to consider there functionality, usability and security. While there has been a push through secure-by-design guidelines for security to be built-in from the beginning there are still gaps in implementation and part of these gaps are design considerations of functionality and usability. Part of this that doing security well is hard work, but it should never block useful functionality for the user. Ideally, when security interferes with key software capabilities, the security must be tweaked. The answer should never be to abandon the functionality and certainly not to abandon the security. Though achieving this balance is admittedly not straightforward. This blog post will aim to look at this triad and how they can be balanced and not compromise each other. Defining the Triad in design A triangle can be used to help explain the relationship between the concepts of security, functionality and ea...
Read more

Personal Interest - Unbuilt fleets of the Royal Navy

Image
Introduction Throughout the 20th Century the Royal Navy designed and examined different types of fleets that were never realised either due to budget constraints, arms treaties or the changing nature of war. These are only a few examples of the different types of unbuilt fleets. Some of these had prototypes built and tasted for the Royal Navy which would serve as technological testbeds. Images and info from secret projects forum, shipbucket, popular mechanics/science and naval-matters. Washington Naval Treaty (WNT) The  Washington Naval Treaty  was a treaty signed during 1922 among the major nations that had won  World War I , which agreed to prevent an  arms race  by limiting naval construction. It was negotiated at the  Washington Naval Conference , held in  Washington, D.C. , from November 1921 to February 1922, and it was signed by the governments of the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Italy, and Japan. It limited the construction ...
Read more

Personal Interest - RAF Unbuilt Projects

Image
  Introduction This blog post looks at the different groups of cancelled RAF projects. It will focus on the 50s, 60s, 90s/00s and a brief look at hypersonic research projects. While these projects were often cut or cancelled for budget or austerity reasons, they were also pushed by the changing nature of warfare firstly from conventional style WW2 warfare to the predicated quick, short scale nuclear war which was expected from 1947 to 1989. Later from the 90s and into the 21st Century a change from state on state conflict to facing insurgencies, counter-terrorism and peacekeeping missions again led to a change in how wars are fought. Though the work and research done on these projects would rarely go to waste with it being used and applied in other projects and works even if sometimes it could take another ten or twenty years before anything operational came of that work. There won't be large amounts of text explaining or exploring the designs there are far better sources f...
Read more