Applying Anthropology to Online Communities

Introduction

This post is the last one in this on applying anthropology series. When it comes to tacking online issues and problems there is a need to understand the types of people who carry out these acts. This requires intelligence of the threats to be collected and because it is about gathering this information from people anthropology based methods can aid in this endeavour. By being able to understand online communities it enables companies, NGOs and law enforcement to tackle crime (cyber/online), hate-groups and extremists/terrorists. 

Platforms
The Internet has facilitated the online interactions of dispersed groups of people with shared interests. These online groups exhibit a wide range of characteristics and serve a variety of purposes, from small groups engaged in tightly focused discussions of specific topics, to complex created worlds with hundreds of simultaneous participants, to millions of users linked by an interest in markets or exchange networks for goods and information. These online platforms can be mobilised to further particular political agendas or to bring together dispersed members of familial or ethnic groups, or they might be organised around commodity consumption or multinational corporate interests.

One of the reasons we need to understand how people view and interact with online platforms is due to opposing views of them because to some, Facebook, Twitter and similar social-media platforms are the enablers of communication by being better, even, than face-to-face conversations, since more people can be involved. Others think of them more as inhibiters of rash communication that fosters narcissism, threatens privacy and reduces intelligent discourse through generated memes. They might go as far as saying creates people who are incapable of reflective, individual, original thought and can only exist with echo chambers.

From research conducted by UCL they examined the types and why are used. The identities users have online can be a reflection of the person when they are offline or a persona of a particular part of themselves. When online communities form they serve to create spaces for groups that exist within the public sphere and private interests. This enables and aids interaction between real-world events and how they can proliferate or be shaped through online platforms. An anthropologist can offer a more holistic, understanding of social media platforms by questioning the assumptions.  The challenge is for researchers alike to how to grasp this dynamic, rapidly changing complexity of online communities. Anthropology can offer key skills to this research. First, they can offer experiences of immersion in varying communities and societies  Second, they can ‘follow’ groups and individuals in order to better understand them. Third, anthropologists have studied dynamic social systems, cultures and people for decades therefore as whole they bring a wealth of experience to research. 

Methods

The basic methods of anthropology include a combination of observation, identifying group dynamics,  tracing origins and developments and finally interviews. All of these methods are done in all branches of anthropology, ethnography and sociology to various degree. Application though will vary to the research situation. There are Six ways of carrying out the research when applying anthropology to online communities.
  1. Viral Contents: Tracking how new contents and media is created, spread and proliferates across online platforms. By the types of users and avenues media content is shared. 
  2. Digital Technologies: This includes the devices and applications people use access online platforms, social media and online communities. 
  3. Digital Technologists: Understanding the types of peoples who create the tools and platforms that are used by online communities. 
  4. A single field of contention: This focus on a single online platform or online community and the users interact within their own group or collective.
  5. A series of fields of contention: This focuses on how multiply online platforms or online communities how groups of users interact between their groups.
  6. Genealogically: Aims to determine where an online community first started and trace their origins of how they developed over time. 

Conclusion

When applying anthropology to studying online communities the main goal is to be able to understand them. This is vital in how they operate because the dynamics of online communities determine what type of actions they may undertake. The study of online communities should generate information and intelligence which can be acted on if they aim carry unlawful actions or malicious act. 




References

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts

Balancing functionality, usability and security in design

Image
Introduction When designing new devices or applications there is a requirement nowadays to consider there functionality, usability and security. While there has been a push through secure-by-design guidelines for security to be built-in from the beginning there are still gaps in implementation and part of these gaps are design considerations of functionality and usability. Part of this that doing security well is hard work, but it should never block useful functionality for the user. Ideally, when security interferes with key software capabilities, the security must be tweaked. The answer should never be to abandon the functionality and certainly not to abandon the security. Though achieving this balance is admittedly not straightforward. This blog post will aim to look at this triad and how they can be balanced and not compromise each other. Defining the Triad in design A triangle can be used to help explain the relationship between the concepts of security, functionality and ea
Read more

Personal Interest - Unbuilt fleets of the Royal Navy

Image
Introduction Throughout the 20th Century the Royal Navy designed and examined different types of fleets that were never realised either due to budget constraints, arms treaties or the changing nature of war. These are only a few examples of the different types of unbuilt fleets. Some of these had prototypes built and tasted for the Royal Navy which would serve as technological testbeds. Images and info from secret projects forum, shipbucket, popular mechanics/science and naval-matters. Washington Naval Treaty (WNT) The  Washington Naval Treaty  was a treaty signed during 1922 among the major nations that had won  World War I , which agreed to prevent an  arms race  by limiting naval construction. It was negotiated at the  Washington Naval Conference , held in  Washington, D.C. , from November 1921 to February 1922, and it was signed by the governments of the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Italy, and Japan. It limited the construction of  battleships ,  battlecruisers
Read more

Personal Interest - RAF Unbuilt Projects

Image
  Introduction This blog post looks at the different groups of cancelled RAF projects. It will focus on the 50s, 60s, 90s/00s and a brief look at hypersonic research projects. While these projects were often cut or cancelled for budget or austerity reasons, they were also pushed by the changing nature of warfare firstly from conventional style WW2 warfare to the predicated quick, short scale nuclear war which was expected from 1947 to 1989. Later from the 90s and into the 21st Century a change from state on state conflict to facing insurgencies, counter-terrorism and peacekeeping missions again led to a change in how wars are fought. Though the work and research done on these projects would rarely go to waste with it being used and applied in other projects and works even if sometimes it could take another ten or twenty years before anything operational came of that work. There won't be large amounts of text explaining or exploring the designs there are far better sources for th
Read more